I'm tired of AI images, their gauziness, which I assume is there to sidestep copyright on the photographs and images they use, just looks like a crapy artist trying to cover up poor technique.
And writers, AI is being used in your jobs. A colleague recently lost a position working in marketing to AI. She's had decades of experience and be…
I'm tired of AI images, their gauziness, which I assume is there to sidestep copyright on the photographs and images they use, just looks like a crapy artist trying to cover up poor technique.
And writers, AI is being used in your jobs. A colleague recently lost a position working in marketing to AI. She's had decades of experience and been part of editorial teams working on bestselling books.
I review books on my Substack, and publishers send me their wares for review. Some of these books are produced, in part, with AI. The first chapter reads just fine, then, starting with the second chapter, I can tell that AI was used for much of the rest of the book. Sure signs are a slight change in tone, the overuse and misuse of the rule of three, and a sameness of paragraph construction. I won't review these books.
I'm tired of AI images, their gauziness, which I assume is there to sidestep copyright on the photographs and images they use, just looks like a crapy artist trying to cover up poor technique.
And writers, AI is being used in your jobs. A colleague recently lost a position working in marketing to AI. She's had decades of experience and been part of editorial teams working on bestselling books.
I review books on my Substack, and publishers send me their wares for review. Some of these books are produced, in part, with AI. The first chapter reads just fine, then, starting with the second chapter, I can tell that AI was used for much of the rest of the book. Sure signs are a slight change in tone, the overuse and misuse of the rule of three, and a sameness of paragraph construction. I won't review these books.