So, you admit complete failure - right we are making progress.
"Only a small fraction of ...what an offset is" That's an admission of failure. After 20+ years of heavy pushing you fall back on "a small fraction". If offsets
were ever going to have any meaningful effect that would be happening by now.
So, you admit complete failure - right we are making progress.
"Only a small fraction of ...what an offset is" That's an admission of failure. After 20+ years of heavy pushing you fall back on "a small fraction". If offsets
were ever going to have any meaningful effect that would be happening by now.
"hey've been scarcely used" - that is because they have been completely and comprehensibly rejected.
You are faced with the fact that offsets are an ignominious failure. yet your response to this being pointed out is "we will get it right next time". Talk about sticking your head in the sand!
There haven't been "20 years of heavy pushing." In regards to carbon offsets, there has mainly been whining and misinformation such as you're pushing, despite some promising and successful examples and agreements. Again, you sound like a person who uses lots of carbon but likes to keep your pollution free. Is this true?
The IPCC notes that to reach climate goals, we will need negative-emissions techniques. Ecological rebuilding will have to be in the mix. And, ways to finance these will be needed. Thus, the hope for offsetting, where the polluter helps to pay.
Check out the book Drawdown by Paul Hawken et al. Take a reading break from your ignorant trolling.
So, you admit complete failure - right we are making progress.
"Only a small fraction of ...what an offset is" That's an admission of failure. After 20+ years of heavy pushing you fall back on "a small fraction". If offsets
were ever going to have any meaningful effect that would be happening by now.
"hey've been scarcely used" - that is because they have been completely and comprehensibly rejected.
You are faced with the fact that offsets are an ignominious failure. yet your response to this being pointed out is "we will get it right next time". Talk about sticking your head in the sand!
There haven't been "20 years of heavy pushing." In regards to carbon offsets, there has mainly been whining and misinformation such as you're pushing, despite some promising and successful examples and agreements. Again, you sound like a person who uses lots of carbon but likes to keep your pollution free. Is this true?
The IPCC notes that to reach climate goals, we will need negative-emissions techniques. Ecological rebuilding will have to be in the mix. And, ways to finance these will be needed. Thus, the hope for offsetting, where the polluter helps to pay.
Check out the book Drawdown by Paul Hawken et al. Take a reading break from your ignorant trolling.
There is only one troll in this thread and it's not me.