We're already able to measure the amount of carbon stored in land and ocean systems, apparently. So, it would seem that, putting much attention into it, we could make this more granular.
We're already able to measure the amount of carbon stored in land and ocean systems, apparently. So, it would seem that, putting much attention into it, we could make this more granular.
Carbon is well mixed in the atmosphere but less so in the oceans due to stratifying effects of temperature and depth; are you implying that we could somehow calculate a specific tonnage of offset via tree planting based on growth rates and species for **every single tree planted**?
We're already able to measure the amount of carbon stored in land and ocean systems, apparently. So, it would seem that, putting much attention into it, we could make this more granular.
Carbon is well mixed in the atmosphere but less so in the oceans due to stratifying effects of temperature and depth; are you implying that we could somehow calculate a specific tonnage of offset via tree planting based on growth rates and species for **every single tree planted**?
It's very complex science. Currently, there are attempts at this with varying accuracy.
But, the principle holds: biodiverse and intact ecosystems sequester carbon and increase resiliency to climate change. This is a strong truth.