And I had a belly laugh when I saw that the Tudor Trust was one of this movement's backers. You know, the Trust that imploded over "Whiteness" (e.g., massive guilt over a permanent attribute one has that is immutable) / and "Social Justice".
And when The Jump states that "Government...have the most responsibility", we're right back to tho…
And I had a belly laugh when I saw that the Tudor Trust was one of this movement's backers. You know, the Trust that imploded over "Whiteness" (e.g., massive guilt over a permanent attribute one has that is immutable) / and "Social Justice".
And when The Jump states that "Government...have the most responsibility", we're right back to those folks that wish to use the force of Government to decide lifestyles.
The self-loathing bit at the end of that #1 "shift" was rather cute to boot.
Summary - you will not be allowed to decide what is best for yourself; someone else will and you will be ecstatic over it. Wonnerful, wonnerful, wonnerful...
Well, it did give me a chance to write a little bit - something that Time hasn't allowed for far too long.
However, you and I always end up at the same place - me asking THE imperative question concerning individuals and governance: Who decides?
And my point is, when is Govt is deciding too much on too many very important things at the cost of removing most important decisions by individuals? With posts like this, the The Jump, and much of TH (well, the former comments that made TH such a lively place to be), it seems that far too many are perfectly fine taking choices away from others on ideological purposes. Liberty? Freedom?
Seemingly outdated concepts according to Eco-Socialists (yes, I've been watching the outtakes from COP28). And once given up, as history has shown us, it is almost impossible to regain them.
And I had a belly laugh when I saw that the Tudor Trust was one of this movement's backers. You know, the Trust that imploded over "Whiteness" (e.g., massive guilt over a permanent attribute one has that is immutable) / and "Social Justice".
And when The Jump states that "Government...have the most responsibility", we're right back to those folks that wish to use the force of Government to decide lifestyles.
The self-loathing bit at the end of that #1 "shift" was rather cute to boot.
Summary - you will not be allowed to decide what is best for yourself; someone else will and you will be ecstatic over it. Wonnerful, wonnerful, wonnerful...
So, how many grams was the chocolate ration/week raised to, again, Winston?
I thought you would enjoy that.
Well, it did give me a chance to write a little bit - something that Time hasn't allowed for far too long.
However, you and I always end up at the same place - me asking THE imperative question concerning individuals and governance: Who decides?
And my point is, when is Govt is deciding too much on too many very important things at the cost of removing most important decisions by individuals? With posts like this, the The Jump, and much of TH (well, the former comments that made TH such a lively place to be), it seems that far too many are perfectly fine taking choices away from others on ideological purposes. Liberty? Freedom?
Seemingly outdated concepts according to Eco-Socialists (yes, I've been watching the outtakes from COP28). And once given up, as history has shown us, it is almost impossible to regain them.
And, for the record, I'm still waiting for the answer to my question.
Look on the bright side, Lloyd, I'm at least paying for it! I'm doing with less! (heh! I'm waiting to see what you'll do with that!).