Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dermot Grenham's avatar

Hi Lloyd, I am sorry you didn't have a good experience on the sleeper. When I travel to London from Glasgow for work I take the sleeper as it is lower carbon than a flight and also it avoids a hotel if I go the night before or an early start if I fly down in the morning. I aim to get on about 10.30 and try to get to sleep as soon as possible before the train leaves the station. The quality of sleep can be variable and you're right about some berths being noisier than others. It usually works out for me as my work pays and I can get a berth with a shower (but the beds are no wider!). I don't do it both ways, I tend to get an ordinary train at the end of the working day.

Expand full comment
Don Parda's avatar

"Where I have a choice, I try to take the low carbon route" ... No. You have the choice of not traveling - the low carbon "route" - staying local. You do a lot of traveling, and most often emit a lot of greenhouse gas in the process. ... "But my travel is necessary." ... That's what they all say. ... And the enormous travel greenhouse gas emissions continue - actually increase as the developing populations follow the lead of the developed populations. .. How about it, Lloyd? Quit traveling - a significant addition to your anti-global-warming leadership. We look forward to progress with green technology and infrastructure that will provide us with emerging green travel options.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts