Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chris Smith's avatar

I travel nationwide for work. When I have time, I like to drive through neighbourhoods* I would consider living in if I had to relocate to that city. Even before I became aware of the term "the missing middle," I found myself drawn to neighbourhoods* that had missing middle structures. I would send my spouse photos of nice-looking 6–8 unit apartment buildings with comments about how cool it would be to have such an option nearby.

I live in a large subdivision/township near the Houston, TX area (125,000+ people) that is reasonably walkable and bikeable. However, for the most part, townhomes are shunted off to the edges, as if only poor, gross people want something smaller and UGLY. That's the problem—affordable townhomes that were built on the more affordable side are UGLY. Meanwhile, some really nice-looking townhomes are closer to the township's desired amenities, but they cost 2–3 times the median house price for the area and are at least twice the size of the smaller townhomes.

I don’t want the missing middle anywhere near me either—if it’s UGLY.

I think the CMHC offers attractive designs for multi-unit structures, appropriately sized for the neighborhood—at least in the illustrations. Make the missing middle scaled correctly AND NOT UGLY, and people might be more receptive.

*Spelled in solidarity with our northern neighbours.

Expand full comment
Charlie Simonds's avatar

Thanks Lloyd. Can Wisconsin become Canada's next province?

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts