"...and found one that was taken down from Treehugger".
And now you are free from their censorship! Again, congratulations!
"...the biggest building designed by a woman architect"
Who cares and why does it matter? I have truly become more than bored by this "First XYZ done by some ethnicity/sex/et al. What's is SO BAD by just acknowledging …
"...and found one that was taken down from Treehugger".
And now you are free from their censorship! Again, congratulations!
"...the biggest building designed by a woman architect"
Who cares and why does it matter? I have truly become more than bored by this "First XYZ done by some ethnicity/sex/et al. What's is SO BAD by just acknowledging "...this <insert name here> should be congratulated for their merit and prowess in doing XYZ".
In fact, it's insulting - it raises up "the political Group" to have a higher place than the person that deserved the applause.
Because a huge part of her merit and prowess was overcoming what must have been enormous social resistance. Plus it marks a shift in society to allow a woman to design this that should be noted and celebrated. This statement is not adding an irrelevant social label to politicize what is otherwise an egalitarian meritocracy. That’s naive an insulting to de Blois, but more so the many female architects of merit who never got the chance because of chauvinism.
"...and found one that was taken down from Treehugger".
And now you are free from their censorship! Again, congratulations!
"...the biggest building designed by a woman architect"
Who cares and why does it matter? I have truly become more than bored by this "First XYZ done by some ethnicity/sex/et al. What's is SO BAD by just acknowledging "...this <insert name here> should be congratulated for their merit and prowess in doing XYZ".
In fact, it's insulting - it raises up "the political Group" to have a higher place than the person that deserved the applause.
Because a huge part of her merit and prowess was overcoming what must have been enormous social resistance. Plus it marks a shift in society to allow a woman to design this that should be noted and celebrated. This statement is not adding an irrelevant social label to politicize what is otherwise an egalitarian meritocracy. That’s naive an insulting to de Blois, but more so the many female architects of merit who never got the chance because of chauvinism.