Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Elrond Burrell's avatar

Love this. So great to see others picking up the comfort conversation, running with it, and taking it even further. “Are we comfortable with the standard of buildings we’re designing & constructing, and the contribution they make to climate change?” is a great question.

Expand full comment
Marc Rosenbaum's avatar

We've been saying and teaching this for >40 years in the superinsulated buildings sector. Sell comfort, durability, health and safety, and resource efficiency has to follow. That ad campaign looks great!

Note that, at least in the cool humid climates like mine in new England, these buildings shift from heating dominated to cooling dominated. My opinion is that the German PH software hasn't kept up with this - I saw a presentation of a skyscraper in Boston with about 20 stories of PH offices - where the German PH analysis showed a cooling load of 2,700 sf per ton (14W/m2). I asked the PH presenter how their mechanical engineer felt about this (unattainable) load, and the response was, oh, he does his own loads.

I would suggest that the US PH standard is more realistic about cooling than the German one, and it should be used in the US. Full disclosure - I went to Europe in 2000 to view Passive Houses and other leading edge buildings, and returned to become one of the first certified PH consultants in the US. I was a Founding Board Member of PHIUS. My concern is that Passive Houses really deliver their promise across all scales and building types, and it seems pretty obvious in a country the size of the US that the hugely varying climates require varying criteria, which PHIUS incorporates.

Finally - early adopters of PH in the US were often 5,000 sf luxury homes, which even at PH standards used more resources than a code-built 1,400 sf ranch. One of the things I advocated for PHIUS as it separated from PHI was to convert the Primary Energy Criterion from a per unit area to a per occupant metric. This happened, and now smaller, more densely occupied buildings are favored rather than penalized. Lloyd, you should appreciate this! I also advocated to change th3 air tightness criterion from Air Changes Per Hour, which again favors larger buildings, to Air Flow Per Unit Area of Thermal Enclosure, which normalizes infiltration across all building sizes, Tiny Houses to Walmarts.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts