Discussion about this post

User's avatar
GraniteGrok's avatar

Like the other folks here, congrats on the successful end to an arduous project to take on: what to put in, what to leave out, shove something else in, and slice it down again. And having the discipline to sit down and "get'r done". Even though, I disagree with some main premises (if I can extrapolate from your writings here and at TH), one HAS to admire the effort and long hours.

Now, that said (and yes, you knew this was coming), I read a few things in the review that require comment. The most obvious one is "...and digs into the sticky business of how those remaining emissions allowances are allocated."

Have you been holding out on us, Lloyd? As in WHO gets to do the allocation, what is the decision system behind that, what are your means of doing that allocation, and how are you going to deal with the pushback against it (e.g., the Dutch Government just fell because of "doing with less" as well as "we're putting you out of business because emissions"?

Or will that last bit be the focus, as VB said, of your next book.

I have a few other questions but I'm juggling a few too many balls right now and I, individually, need to determine priorities and allocations. Later, sir!

Expand full comment
Mark Hambridge's avatar

Delicious irony in LR's favourable review: "How do we make do with less? Alter offers concrete examples."

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts