Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jason Morse's avatar

I recently finished reading the latest biography of Buckminster Fuller. Was fascinating and frustrating how determined he was to invent a standardized container dwelling despite the intractable challenges of fitting mechanical systems and furniture. It didn't start with geodesic domes at first, but his commitment to promoting domes only led to any success as a public novelty and most functionally as a Radome (which are kinda neat).

Expand full comment
Arthur's avatar

I think of myself as a bit of a hippy but I never got the fascination with dome houses. They always struck me as a neat looking but impractical solution for anything other than temporary tent like structures. They look good on paper. Cheap to heat, open floor plan allows flexible interior design, structurally robust, amenable to factory/prefab construction, offer good options for bringing in natural light, etc. In real life they seem to be a novelty destined to be a pita. Taming the weather/moisture problem is no mean feat. The number of exposed non vertical seams pretty much guarantees leaks in any environment that has any significant heat and or moisture fluctuations over time. The quality of material and level of precision in manufacturing and assembly required to address this problem are difficult to obtain in practice. Building spaceships in a lab is much different than living in them in a four season environment. Construction that actually is able to address the leak problem is likely to be expensive and not amenable to do it yourself construction, maintenance or repair. Operating costs will get costly over time (or you get disposable buildings). Building SIP’s that can fully exploit the geodesic dome shape to maximize its natural advantages regarding heating imposes another difficult construction exercise that is unlikely to produce results that will stand the test of time. In general, the level of technology required to build them well enough to overcome their inherent challenges means there is little room for DYI’ers here (count me out in this point alone). $60k without a foundation for 300sqft does not sound cheap to me and I would guess that you are looking at 50% or more on top to have it built on site. I, with a couple of semi skilled, handy helpers and material on site could probably build a similar size rectangular, wood frame, fully insulated (r30 in the walls and floor and R40 in ceiling), well lit, steel roofed building (including floor and pad footing) for half that amount in little more than a long weekend. It will last 50 plus years with minimal maintenance and without requiring any significant repair and even then a new roof and and some some minor repair will set it up for another 50 years of service. Maybe geodesic domes will find a place on the moon or Mars someday but I think they will remain a novelty here.

P.S: I am still not a fan of airtight buildings despite the math on the energy use advantages. Again, the level of technology required to do it well is significant, expensive and prone to failures that create serious health risks, it requires significant and expensive maintenance, (no DIYers please ) and it encourages building bigger than necessary by promising low heating and cooling costs. There are lots of simple, low tech, effective, practical ways to make healthy, durable, smartly efficient buildings that can stand the test of time. Build low, build small, build strong, build simple and don’t throw out the baby with the bath water when trying to find a better way to get something done.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts